Why MPs won’t enact new constitution within a year

By Peter Opiyo

Constitutional experts have warned Parliament is unlikely to endorse a new constitution within a year for fear of fresh elections.

The Law Society of Kenya (LSK) constitutional committee says a new constitution would also mean the end of the Grand Coalition Government.

(LSK Chairman Okongo Omogeni (centre) with members of the committee on constitutional review at the County Hall, on Tuesday. PHOTO: COLLINS KWEYU)
 
Consequently, it has presented incremental amendments in two crucial Bills to the Parliamentary Committee on the Administration of Justice and Legal Affairs.

LSK Chairman Okong’o Omogeni said the National Accord and Reconciliation Act says the coalition would not hold once the new constitution is in place.

“MPs are unlikely to pass the new constitution because it means they would go home and face fresh elections, and the coalition government would equally not be in place,” he said.

Committee member Apollo Mboya said the coalition government a temporary measure and would be insolvent should the new constitution prefer a parliamentary or presidential system of governance.

LSK now wants Parliament to withdraw the Constitution of Kenya Review Bill, 2008, and the Constitution of Kenya (Ammendment) Bill, 2008, for re-drafting.

The two Bills lay the roadmap of achieving a new constitution.

The Constitution of Kenya Review Bill is a continuation of the National Accord and Reconciliation process and is aimed at solving underlying problems.

The Constitution of Kenya (Ammendment) Bill on the other hand, aims to entrench a referendum in the Constitution.

This was based on Justice Aaron Ringera’s judgement in the Timothy Njoya case, which stated that a new constitution could only be enacted either through a referendum or a constituent assembly.

But LSK wants this amended, arguing it is borrowed from India.

Courtesy of;http://www.eastandard.net/print.php?id=1143991253&cid=159&