<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More researchers disputes Raila&#8217;s call for luo force foreskin chopping project in Luoland. &#8220;Is scientifically dangerous&#8221;, says Dr Makondingo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://majimbokenya.com/home/2008/09/22/more-researchers-disputes-railas-call-for-luo-force-foreskin-chopping-project-in-luoland-is-scientifically-dangerous-says-dr-makondingo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://majimbokenya.com/home/2008/09/22/more-researchers-disputes-railas-call-for-luo-force-foreskin-chopping-project-in-luoland-is-scientifically-dangerous-says-dr-makondingo/</link>
	<description>Majimbo</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://majimbokenya.com/home/2008/09/22/more-researchers-disputes-railas-call-for-luo-force-foreskin-chopping-project-in-luoland-is-scientifically-dangerous-says-dr-makondingo/comment-page-1/#comment-6632</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 15:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://majimbokenya.com/home/?p=3228#comment-6632</guid>
		<description>If a mature male wishes to embark on a wildly promiscuous sex life and does not want to use condoms he is perfectly at liberty to have himself circumcised if he thinks that will help. That is no reason for doing it to everybody. Others may wish to be monogamous, only practise safe sex, or not engage in sex at all. It’s a person’s right to choose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a mature male wishes to embark on a wildly promiscuous sex life and does not want to use condoms he is perfectly at liberty to have himself circumcised if he thinks that will help. That is no reason for doing it to everybody. Others may wish to be monogamous, only practise safe sex, or not engage in sex at all. It’s a person’s right to choose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TLCTugger</title>
		<link>http://majimbokenya.com/home/2008/09/22/more-researchers-disputes-railas-call-for-luo-force-foreskin-chopping-project-in-luoland-is-scientifically-dangerous-says-dr-makondingo/comment-page-1/#comment-6550</link>
		<dc:creator>TLCTugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 16:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://majimbokenya.com/home/?p=3228#comment-6550</guid>
		<description>Wow!  Quite a comprehensive debunking of circumcision myths.  Follow the money for these UN and W.H.O. recommendations, I say.  The W.H.O. is not a medical association.  It is a desperate ineffective charity handcuffed by anti-condom forces.  

Of the world's actual medical associations, not one endorses routine circumcision.  

Most of the US men who have died of AIDS were circumcised at birth.  Circumcsision does not prevent AIDS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  Quite a comprehensive debunking of circumcision myths.  Follow the money for these UN and W.H.O. recommendations, I say.  The W.H.O. is not a medical association.  It is a desperate ineffective charity handcuffed by anti-condom forces.  </p>
<p>Of the world&#8217;s actual medical associations, not one endorses routine circumcision.  </p>
<p>Most of the US men who have died of AIDS were circumcised at birth.  Circumcsision does not prevent AIDS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
